Informaatiota ja keskustelupalstoja on useitakin netin kautta.Niitä yhteyksiä kerätään tälle sivulle.Jos sinulla on tiedossasi hyvä linkki, niin voit jättää sen tännekommentit -osion kautta tai sähköpostitse: cdvertaistuki (at) gmail.com

1: Gastroenterology. 2009 Apr;136(4):1206-14. Epub 2008 Dec 13. Links Comment in: Gastroenterology. 2009 Apr;136(4):1152-4. Prospective derivation and validation of a clinical prediction rule for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Hu MY, Katchar K, Kyne L, Maroo S, Tummala S, Dreisbach V, Xu H, Leffler DA, Kelly CP. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA. BACKGROUND & AIMS: Prevention of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a substantial therapeutic challenge. A previous prospective study of 63 patients with CDI identified risk factors associated with recurrence. This study aimed to develop a prediction rule for recurrent CDI using the above derivation cohort and prospectively evaluate the performance of this rule in an independent validation cohort. METHODS: The clinical prediction rule was developed by multivariate logistic regression analysis and included the following variables: age>65 years, severe or fulminant illness (by the Horn index), and additional antibiotic use after CDI therapy. A second rule combined data on serum concentrations of immunoglobulin G (IgG) against toxin A with the clinical predictors. Both rules were then evaluated prospectively in an independent cohort of 89 patients with CDI. RESULTS: The clinical prediction rule discriminated between patients with and without recurrent CDI, with an area under the curve of the receiver-operating-characteristic curve of 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-0.95) in the derivation cohort and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.67-0.92) in the validation cohort. The rule correctly classified 77.3% (95% CI: 62.2%-88.5%) and 71.9% (95% CI: 59.2%-82.4%) of patients in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. The combined rule performed well in the derivation cohort but not in the validation cohort (area under the curve of the receiver-operating-characteristic curve, 0.89 vs 0.62; diagnostic accuracy, 93.8% vs 69.2%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We prospectively derived and validated a clinical prediction rule for recurrent CDI that is simple, reliable, and accurate and can be used to identify high-risk patients most likely to benefit from measures to prevent recurrence. PMID: 19162027 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?orig_db=PubMed&db =pubmed&cmd=Search&defaultField=Title%20Word&term=Gastroenterology[jour]%20AND%20136[volume] %20AND%201206[page]%20AND%202009[pdat]

 

YHTEISTYÖSSÄ

PROFIILI